Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Alive Business PlanAlive Business Plan

Investing

Ex-FamilyMart minority shareholders secure another landmark win over Itochu buyout

By Makiko Yamazaki and Ritsuko Shimizu

TOKYO (Reuters) – Tokyo’s high court has ruled the fair value of FamilyMart shares was 13% higher than Itochu’s buyout offer, in another landmark win for minority shareholders with implications for future deals in Japan.

The ruling, dated Oct. 31 and reviewed by Reuters, said FamilyMart shareholders that petitioned for a better price should be paid 2,600 yen ($17.08) per share, 300 yen more than the 2,300 yen that Itochu offered for the convenience store chain’s shares it did not already own in 2020.

The decision, which largely upheld a lower court’s ruling, could reopen the door for minority shareholders unhappy with buyouts to get a court decision on a fair price for the target company, a route that had been inactive in Japan since a 2016 court ruling.

FamilyMart said it planned to appeal the decision, adding it was “highly disappointed that the fairness of the procedures we have insisted upon has not been recognised.” Itochu declined to comment.

The high court said Itochu’s tender offer was not conducted through generally accepted fair process because it failed to reflect the opinion from FamilyMart’s independent committee that the price was not high enough.

The financial adviser to FamilyMart’s independent committee had suggested a range of 2,472 yen to 3,040 yen.

Structurally, there is always a potential conflict of interest between a parent seeking to take its listed subsidiary private and the subsidiary’s minority shareholders, or between company executives and shareholders in management buyouts.

As the number of buyout deals rise in Japan, more minority shareholders have been exercising appraisal rights to seek higher prices for their shares after they are squeezed out.

But Japanese courts have refrained from assessing fair value in buyouts since a 2016 ruling over a Jupiter Telecommunications tender offer where the supreme court concluded a tender offer price agreed through a generally accepted fair process should constitute fair value.

The ruling effectively mandated petitioning shareholders to prove the tender offer process was flawed before making courts look into fair value, significantly reducing the chances of winning a higher price.

($1 = 152.2400 yen)

This post appeared first on investing.com
Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    You May Also Like

    Latest News

    The Gateway Pundit, a far-right website, published a note from its editor on Saturday acknowledging that two election workers in Georgia did not engage...

    Latest News

    New majorities in Congress, particularly when the incoming party has a new leader, offer the rare chance for the institution to take a breath...

    Latest News

    Sister Stephanie Schmidt had a hunch about what her fellow nuns would discuss over dinner at their Erie, Pennsylvania, monastery on Wednesday night. The...

    Investing

    JAKARTA (Reuters) -Indonesia has asked Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL)’s Google and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) to block Chinese fast fashion e-commerce firm Temu in their application stores in...



    Disclaimer: alivebusinessplan.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2024 alivebusinessplan.com